Contents
Takes about 30 seconds
Can an old photo be restored?
Picture restoration, photo restoration and old photo restoration all name the same job, and nothing below changes depending on which word brought you here.
Almost always, and usually better than people expect. Scratches, creases, tears, water stains, fading and soft focus are all recoverable, because the information needed to repair them is still present in the parts of the photograph around the damage. A model that has seen millions of undamaged photographs can work out what belongs in the gap.
What cannot be recovered is anything that was never captured. A face in a torn-off corner, the true color of a dress in a black and white frame, a licence plate too small for the film to resolve: those get filled in convincingly rather than recovered, and the difference matters. That line is drawn properly in what it invents below.
The rest of this is the practical order of work: get a good scan, pick the right operation, check the result, keep the original. Most disappointing restorations fail at the first of those, not the second.
Step 1: get a good scan
More people search for how to scan old photos than for how to restore them, which is the right instinct. Nothing downstream can add detail your scan did not capture, so this step sets the ceiling for everything else.
| Resolution | Good for | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| 300 dpi | Reprinting at the original size | The minimum |
| 600 dpi | Cropping, enlarging, restoring | What to use |
| 1200 dpi | Small originals and negatives | Only if tiny |
| 2400 dpi and up | Scanning the texture of the paper | Wasted effort |
Save as TIFF or maximum-quality JPEG. Every re-save of a normal JPEG throws away a little more detail, and you only get to scan the print once.
Clean the glass and the print. Dust on the scanner bed becomes dust in the file, and a restoration model will faithfully treat it as part of the photograph. A soft brush on the print and a microfibre cloth on the glass takes a minute and removes work later.
No scanner? A phone is fine. Put the print on a flat surface near a window, turn the flash off, and hold the camera parallel to the photograph rather than at an angle. Keep your own shadow out of the frame, which usually means standing to the side of the light rather than between it and the print. A careful phone photo restores better than a careless scan.
One thing worth doing while the prints are out of the album: scan the back as well if anything is written on it. Names and dates in a relative's handwriting are the part nobody can reconstruct later, and they are lost far more often than the image is.
Step 2: restore it
With a decent scan in hand the actual restoration is short. These are the five steps, and the only one people skip is the fourth.
- Get the photo into the computer. Scan it at 600 dpi, or photograph it with a phone in flat daylight. This step decides the ceiling for everything after it, which is why it has its own section above.
- Say what is wrong with it. Damage, softness and missing color are different operations. Picking Restore on a faded print and Colorize on a black and white one gets a better result than running everything through one general enhancer.
- Run it, and wait about thirty seconds. The model fills the damaged regions from the surrounding detail, rebuilds the faces, and predicts color where there is none. Nothing about this needs an editor or a plugin.
- Check it at full size before you trust it. Open the download at 100 percent and look at the faces and the hands. This is where invented detail shows up, and it is a thirty-second check that saves you printing something wrong.
- Keep the original scan. The scan is the document and the restoration is an interpretation of it. Keep both, and never throw away the file the scanner produced.
If the photograph is both damaged and black and white, repair it before adding color, never the other way round. A scratch reads to a colorization model as the edge of an object, so it paints along the line and leaves a colored stripe that is harder to remove than the scratch was. A tool that does both in one pass handles that ordering for you; there is more on the colour side in colorizing black and white photos.
What it repairs, and what it invents
This is the section most guides leave out, and it is the one that decides whether you will be happy with the result. Some of a restored photograph is recovered from information that was always there. Some of it is a confident guess. Both look equally real.
| In the photo | Why | Which is it? |
|---|---|---|
| Scratches, creases and tears | Filled from the surrounding detail | recovered |
| Fading and yellowing | Contrast and tone are recoverable | recovered |
| Soft focus and grain | Trained on millions of sharp equivalents | recovered |
| Water stains and mould marks | Treated as damage, not as content | recovered |
| A missing corner with a face in it | The face is invented, not recovered | invented |
| The color of a specific dress or car | No record of it survives in the frame | invented |
| Text too small to read in the original | Plausible letters, not the real ones | invented |
| A face that was never in focus | There is nothing underneath to rebuild | invented |
The practical rule: keep the original scan, and say so when you share the result. Nobody minds being told that the colors are an interpretation, and it stops a predicted blue dress becoming family fact two generations later.
Doing it on a phone
The prints are usually in a box and the camera is already in your hand, so the phone is where most of this starts. There is no need to install anything: ours runs in Safari and Chrome on iOS and Android and gives the same result as on a laptop, because the work happens on a server rather than on the handset.
The phone-specific advice is all about the capture rather than the restoring. Flat surface, daylight, flash off, camera parallel to the print, your shadow out of the frame. If the print is glossy and the reflection will not go away, tilt the print slightly rather than the camera, then straighten the result when you crop.
For a whole box rather than a handful, a dedicated scanning app is worth it: it detects several prints on a table at once, crops and deskews them. We compare the options in the photo restoration app comparison.
Doing it by hand in Photoshop
It is a fair question and the honest answer is that Photoshop will beat any AI on a photograph that matters, if you have the hours. There is no Restore button: the manual method is the Spot Healing Brush and the Clone Stamp for the damage, Curves for the fading, and a great deal of patience around hair and faces.
Two to four hours per photograph is normal for someone competent, which is the same labour a professional charges for. For one irreplaceable photograph that is time well spent. For the forty others in the box it is a month of evenings, which is the whole reason this category exists.
Paying a professional
Hand restoration runs $50 to $150 per photograph with a turnaround of a few days, and more for complex work such as rebuilding a face from a torn fragment. That is a fair price for two to four hours of skilled work, and for the right photograph it is the correct answer.
It is the correct answer when the photograph is genuinely destroyed rather than damaged, when a specific colour has to be right and you know what it was, or when the result is going to be printed large and hung on a wall. A human can be told that the uniform was Royal Navy blue. A model cannot know it.
It is the wrong answer for volume. At $100 a photograph a box of forty is $4,000 and several months, against about $0.44 a photograph and an evening. Most people end up doing both: everything through the automated route, and the two or three that really matter sent to a person.
As for drugstore and supermarket photo counters, they are built around printing and scanning rather than restoration. Where restoration is offered it is usually sent out and priced like professional work. They are genuinely useful for the scanning step if you do not own a scanner, but services vary by branch and change often, so call the specific store.
What it costs to do it here
One credit restores one photo, and a credit is between $0.44 and $0.70 depending on the pack. There is no subscription: the packs are a one-time purchase and the credits do not expire, which matters because nobody restores photographs steadily. People do twenty the week a shoebox turns up and nothing for six months.
| Pack | Photos | Price | Full 1080p | No watermark | Never expires | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Basic | 10 | $6.99$0.70 each | Full 1080p: included | No watermark: included | Never expires: included | Buy |
| Plus | 25 | $16.99$0.68 each | Full 1080p: included | No watermark: included | Never expires: included | Buy |
| Probest value | 50 | $29.99$0.60 each | Full 1080p: included | No watermark: included | Never expires: included | Buy |
| Studio | 100 | $54.99$0.55 each | Full 1080p: included | No watermark: included | Never expires: included | Buy |
| Max | 250 | $109.99$0.44 each | Full 1080p: included | No watermark: included | Never expires: included | Buy |
One credit restores one photo. Every pack includes the same everything: nothing is held back for the larger ones, and the only difference is how many photos you get.
An animation costs 3 credits rather than one, because it is a video model. Results stay in your history for 30 days so a second download never costs a second credit, the output is 1080p with no watermark, and there is a 30-day money-back guarantee. You sign in with Google and we never ask for a card until you pick a pack.
If you meant deleted photos
Worth separating, because the same word covers two unrelated problems and search engines mix them up. This page is about repairing a photograph that is damaged. Recovering a photograph that was deleted from a phone or a memory card is a different job, done with different software, and nothing here will help with it.
The short version for that problem: look in the Recently Deleted album on an iPhone or the Bin in Google Photos first, because both hold files for around 30 days. After that it is file recovery software on the card, and the chance of success drops every time the device writes anything new. Stop using the card and deal with it immediately.
Questions people ask
Is picture restoration the same as photo restoration?
Yes. They are two names for one job: taking a damaged, faded or soft photograph and putting it back to something close to how it looked. You will also see it called old photo restoration, photo repair and photo retouching. The only distinction worth making is who does the work. A restoration studio has a person retouch the file by hand over hours; an AI restorer does the common repairs in about thirty seconds for a fraction of the price. Both are picture restoration.
Can old pictures be restored?
Almost always, and better than most people expect. Scratches, creases, tears, water stains, fading and soft focus are all recoverable, because the information needed to repair them is still in the surrounding image. What cannot be recovered is information that was never captured: a face in a missing corner, the true color of a dress in a black and white frame, or text too small for the original film to resolve. AI will fill those convincingly, which is exactly why you should know which half of the photo you are looking at.
What is the best way to scan old photos?
A flatbed scanner at 600 dpi, saved as TIFF or maximum-quality JPEG, with the glass and the print both clean. 300 dpi is enough for reprinting at the same size, 600 gives room to crop and enlarge, and above 1200 you are mostly scanning the grain of the paper. If you do not have a scanner, a phone works: put the print on a flat surface near a window, turn the flash off, hold the camera parallel rather than at an angle, and keep your shadow out of the frame. A phone photo of a print restores better than a bad scan does.
How much does professional photo restoration cost?
Between $50 and $150 per photograph for hand restoration, with a turnaround of a few days, and that is a fair price for two to four hours of skilled work in Photoshop. Complex jobs, such as rebuilding a face from a torn fragment or matching a known color, run higher. AI restoration costs under a dollar a photo and takes about thirty seconds. The honest comparison is not quality for quality: a professional still wins on a photograph that is genuinely destroyed or where a specific color has to be right. The question is whether every photograph in the box deserves that.
Can ChatGPT restore old photos?
It will produce something, and at a glance it can be impressive. The problem for a photograph of a real person is that it regenerates the image rather than repairing the one you gave it, so faces drift: the result looks like your grandmother rather than being her. It also returns whatever size the model produces instead of the resolution of your scan. For a torn print you want a tool that keeps the original pixels and only fills what is missing. Run the same photo through both and compare the faces at full size.
Can a drugstore or photo counter restore old photos?
Retail photo counters are built around printing and scanning rather than restoration, and where restoration is offered it is usually sent to a third party and priced like professional work. What they are genuinely useful for is the scanning step if you do not own a scanner and do not want to photograph two hundred prints. Services and prices vary by chain and by branch and change often, so call the specific store rather than trusting a page like this one.
Is there a free way to restore old photos?
Several tools advertise it, and it is worth knowing how they are paid for: a watermark on the result, a download capped at a few hundred pixels, ads with a daily limit, or a card for a trial that renews into a monthly charge. Ours is none of those: one-time credit packs with no subscription and no free tier. Whichever you try, produce a result, download the actual file, and open it at full size before paying anything.
Should I restore the photo or colorize it first?
Restore first, always. A scratch reads to a colorization model as a boundary between two objects, so it paints along the line and leaves a colored stripe that is harder to remove than the original scratch was. Any tool that does both in one pass handles this for you; if you are chaining two tools, run the repair first and the color second.
Will restoring a photo damage the original?
No. Everything here works on a copy: the scan or the phone photo. The print itself is never touched, and the original file is never overwritten. That is also the reason to keep the scan after you are done, because the restoration is an interpretation and the scan is the evidence.





























